可登记财产利益的交易自由——从两岸民事法制的观点看物权法定原则松绑的界线

刻意把债法和物法放在对立面的传统民法典体例,形成了许多似是而非的逻辑,把财产法的释义学弄得没有必要的复杂。因此在检讨物权法定原则的立法政策之前,有必要再一次厘清限制物权的"关系权"本质。至于法定还是自由,比较有说服力的讨论恐怕也只有成本一效益的分析,这部分同样需要对一些很基本的观念先有共识,才不至于沦为各说各话。本文即接续过去两度提出的经济分析观点,参考后来的一些文章,再作一点补充。我国台湾地区的立法者已经采取了行动,在不动产所有权上交易者已经可以依其需要自由建立对世性的财产关系。大陆因为土地迄未开放私有,使得这个问题的讨论变得格外复杂,必须从社会主义市场经济体制的语境,重新检视物权的性质,并验证自由化的成本效益。本文也尝试在极有限的信息基础上,作一些最初步的探讨。     

对《刑法修正案(七)草案》第11条的几点质疑

《中华人民共和国刑法修正案（七）草案》第11条拟在刑法第388条中增设两类“影响力交易”犯罪行为,加强了对非国家工作人员参与腐败犯罪的打击力度。但此项修改内容自身也存在着一定的问题,诸如第11条采用的修改模式是否合理？其设计的两类“影响力交易”犯罪行为能否满足刑事立法的前瞻性要求等等,有必要对其进行进一步修改完善。     

中国通论犯罪构成理论体系评判

如果将犯罪构成理论理解为解释法律的理论体系，那么理论体系的设定就应当遵循安全性、可操作性两个价值前提。依据这两个价值前提评价我国通论的四要件犯罪构成理论体系，该理论体系的一次性评价的体系设计，出罪通道的不畅通，导致刑法运行安全方面的保障欠缺；将一个总体的犯罪评价对象即犯罪行为，拆分为四个方面的理论体系思路，难于符合人的一般思维习惯；具有可操作性方面的问题。因此，通论四要件的犯罪构成理论体系不具有选择的合理性。     

Distributive Justice and Crime

The heavy concentration of crime on a few areas, and the concentration on the chronically victimised within those areas, together illustrate the gross inequality of the risk of crime victimisation. This inequality also characterises other hazards of life. Criminology has too often reduced the problem of crime to the problem of the offender. Recognising crime hazard as an issue of distributive justice requires a different mind set. The Crime and Disorder Act 1998 recognises the drivers of crime as lying outside criminal justice, but does not put in place a panhazard analysis of the kind required, community safety being presented as a type of crime prevention. Movement towards panhazard thinking may well be somewhat facilitated by the workingthrough of the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights, actions flowing from section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act, and a reconsideration of how emergency services might work.     

Make and Buy—An Alternative to Make or Buy? An Investigation of Four Theoretical Explanations in Danish Municipalities

The question of whether public organizations should provide services themselves or buy them from external suppliers has become increasingly relevant due to public-sector modernization. The literature has focused on it as a question of either make or buy. Contrarily, we focus on the reasons for public organizations to simultaneously produce and contract out similar services. The article investigates different theoretical explanations for concurrent make and buy. A survey of Danish municipalities shows that make and buy seems to be a steady choice. However, the results show little support for the theoretical explanations indicating the need for more public-oriented explanations.     

建立医疗机构医疗安全预警管理系统的必要性研究

本文从当前医疗机构在医疗安全方面所面临的严峻挑战出发,根据现代医疗安全管理理论,探索建立适合各个医疗机构的以预防为主的医疗安全预警管理系统的必要性。从而为建立综合性风险监测和预警机制奠定基础。